Short answer
Current higher-price-position options: Fred Perry, GANT, Tommy Hilfiger, Lacoste and 2 more.
These brands qualified from the existing reviewed relationship graph; this page does not create a second, looser standard just to target a narrower phrase.
product coverage (6/6 close)audience (6/6 close)market reach (6/6 close)
AlternativeClosest on price, aesthetic, products, audience, markets
PremiumGenerally more premium
Ben Sherman and Fred Perry share unusually strong British subcultural heritage, with polos/shirts, music and mod-adjacent style giving shoppers meaningful crossover.
PriceClose
AestheticClose
ProductsClose
AudienceClose
MarketsClose
Where it differsBen Sherman is more shirt-led and rooted in colorful Ivy-influenced tailoring, while Fred Perry is more tennis-sportswear rooted and identified with the tipped polo.
Consider it if: Consider Fred Perry when sport heritage and iconic polos matter more than Ben Sherman’s statement shirting and mod-tailoring roots.
AlternativeClosest on price, aesthetic, products, audience, markets
PremiumGenerally more premium
Ben Sherman and GANT overlap through Ivy-influenced shirting, polos and smart-casual heritage wardrobes that bridge casual and dressed-up menswear.
PriceClose
AestheticClose
ProductsClose
AudienceClose
MarketsClose
Where it differsBen Sherman is more British-mod and subculture coded, while GANT is more American-prep/Ivy heritage and broader in polished lifestyle clothing.
Consider it if: Consider GANT when classic prep and polished heritage matter more than mod attitude and music-subculture identity.
AlternativeClosest on price, products, audience, markets
PremiumGenerally more premium
Ben Sherman and Tommy Hilfiger both reinterpret Ivy/American prep references through recognizable shirts, polos, knitwear and casual heritage pieces.
PriceClose
AestheticPartial
ProductsClose
AudienceClose
MarketsClose
Where it differsBen Sherman is more British, mod and shirt-specialist in identity; Tommy Hilfiger is broader, more global and more logo/prep lifestyle oriented across families and categories.
Consider it if: Consider Tommy Hilfiger when broader American prep and lifestyle breadth matter more than Ben Sherman’s sharper mod/subculture focus.
AlternativeClosest on price, products, audience, markets
PremiumGenerally more premium
Ben Sherman and Lacoste both give polo shirts and smart casual sportswear a strong heritage identity, making Lacoste a useful alternative for clean collared dressing.
PriceClose
AestheticPartial
ProductsClose
AudienceClose
MarketsClose
Where it differsBen Sherman is British mod/shirting led; Lacoste is French tennis-sportswear led with stronger athletic roots and the crocodile polo as its core icon.
Consider it if: Consider Lacoste when tennis heritage and sport-derived polos matter more than mod shirting and subculture references.
AlternativeClosest on aesthetic, products, audience, markets
PremiumGenerally more premium
Ben Sherman and Hackett London both offer recognizably British alternatives across collared shirts, polos and refined casual clothing.
PricePartial
AestheticClose
ProductsClose
AudienceClose
MarketsClose
Where it differsBen Sherman is more subcultural and youthful; Hackett is more sartorial, premium and rooted in classic English tailoring.
Consider it if: Consider Hackett London when you want Ben Sherman’s British identity in a more traditional premium tailoring and smart-weekend direction.
AlternativeClosest on products, audience, markets
PremiumGenerally more premium
Ben Sherman and Paul Smith both give shoppers British alternatives that carry more personality than anonymous business basics.
PricePartial
AestheticPartial
ProductsClose
AudienceClose
MarketsClose
Where it differsBen Sherman is more youthful/mod and accessible; Paul Smith is more premium, sartorial and creatively designed.
Consider it if: Consider Paul Smith when tailoring quality, designer detail and a broader premium wardrobe matter more than mod-focused value.